Legacy landmark changes

I understand the city is considering limiting the duration of the dedication under this program

Filed for publication with the Mirror

Re: City Considering Changes to Legacy Landmarks Program

I write this letter on my own behalf as an expression of my concerns. In no way do I intend to suggest I am the only one impacted. The specific picnic table is important to all of my parents’ children, children-in-law, grandchildren, siblings, siblings-in-law, nieces, nephews, and other family members and friends.  Many of whom still reside in Campbell River. I imagine others with existing dedications under this program would have similar concerns.

I understand the city is considering limiting the duration of the dedication under this program to a 25 year lease. Our family since 2008 have had a single picnic table in the memory of both my mother and father, Bernie and Lolita Doherty.  The city`s suggestions as to changes to the program cause me considerable concern for a number of reasons, including the following.

The city would be unilaterally changing an agreement it made with me as executor of my parents’ wills. The city does not have the right to unilaterally change existing agreements; if I am wrong on this point, it would be unethical for the city to unilaterally change existing agreements. If the city wants to change the agreement, or even withdraw the availability of an agreement, for newcomers then that would be a very different consideration.  We would have to take that into consideration if we were looking to honour another loved one in the future.

The city comes across as making deaths of loved ones into a commercial enterprise.  When the city needed picnic tables and park benches, people were invited to financially contribute. The individuals did it as a memorial to a loved one; the city comes across as having done it for financial reasons only (i.e., people subsidizing the cost of picnic tables and benches so as to make them affordable for the city to install).  By unilaterally terminating existing agreements and allowing others to come in to take over the legacy landmarks, the city’s insensitivity is amplified. The city would then come across as preferring a continuing stream of income from the continuing stream of the deaths of loved ones; the landmarks would be but a necessary by-product the city has to tolerate to extract money out of people’s wallets.

My parents were cremated. The picnic table dedicated to their memory serves for us the function a gravesite would serve for others.

The city comes across as having poorly planned the initial program and now wants to remedy its oversights at the emotional and financial expense of those who rightly made use of the program.  Any such corrections need to properly come at the expense of the city.

The city had no obligation to make the existing program available; presumably it chose to do so on the basis of a program it designed taking into consideration its resources and obligations. The city has no obligation to make this program available to newcomers (including us in respect of memorials for others in the future). It has to choose whether to do so taking into consideration its present and future resources.  Resources it has already committed in relation to existing memorials should not properly be counted as resources available to the city.

Should any steps be taken to remove or substantially alter the dedication to the memory of my parents or to the program which authorizes the dedication to exist, I require that you notify me appropriately in advance.  This will allow me to serve such court documents on the city as I believe are warranted.  Let this letter serve as notice that if the city makes any changes without allowing this opportunity, I will rely upon this letter in response to any argument the city may make about the costs of then undoing any changes it has made.

I am not so naïve as to believe anything is forever. That aside, the callous manner in which the city has considered unilaterally changing its obligations is reprehensible.  For many of us, these landmarks/memorials are the equivalent of gravesites. Any alteration to the duration of the landmarks/memorials should be considered along with a consideration to limiting the duration of gravesites.

This issue impacts me tremendously.

Barbara L. Basi (nee Doherty)


Just Posted

UPDATE: Fast-burning construction materials fuelled Willow Point blaze – fire chief

Curious onlookers created challenges for emergency crews; fundraising effort underway for family

UPDATED: Zeballos wildfire not getting any closer to town – BC Wildfire Service

About 64 wildfires burning north of Campbell River on Tuesday

Strathcona Regional District wants water meters for northern Area D

Meters just part of plan, along with education and enforcement, to reduce use

‘Beauty amongst such tragedy:’ B.C. photographer captures nature’s trifecta

David Luggi’s photo from a beach in Fraser Lake shows Shovel Lake wildfire, Big Dipper and an aurora

Social media, digital photography allow millennials to flock to birdwatching

More young people are flocking to birdwatching than ever, aided by social media, digital photography

Forest fuel work needed to slow wildfires, B.C. premier says

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan joins John Horgan for tour

Liberals unveil poverty plan with lofty goals, but no new spending

Government’s goal is to lift 2.1 million people out of poverty by 2030

PHOTOS: Prickly porcupine rescued after hitchhiking down Coquihalla Highway

BC Conservation Officer Service members were able to grab the porcupine and move it to safety

New trial ordered for James Oler in B.C. child bride case

Appeals court dismissed Emily Blackmore’s appeal of guilty verdict

Convicted murderer still missing after escaping B.C. prison 2 weeks ago

Mission RCMP are continuing to search for escaped inmate John Norman MacKenzie

Smoky skies trap B.C. man inside for days

Air quality warning issued for Metro Vancouver and Fraser Valley

Surf’s up in California, where it’s now the official sport

Grab a board, catch a wave and find yourself, ‘sittin’ on top of the world’

Case of truck driver charged in Humboldt Broncos crash adjourned until October

Jaskirat Singh Sidhu is charged with 16 counts of dangerous driving causing death, other charges

Most Read