EDITORIAL: To plump, or not to plump your vote

General voting day for the municipal elections is Saturday.

By now, hopefully most voters have their minds made up as to who will get their “x” on the ballot.

Municipal elections are unique in that it’s an opportunity for the electorate to choose multiple people for the same positions.

Of course, we would normally only get one choice for mayor (or regional director) but this year, we don’t due to no one running against incumbent mayor Andy Adams. However, when it comes to council, there are more options.

Campbell River residents will elect six council members. As such, voters are allowed to choose up to six candidates. The key words here are “up to.”

And that’s where voting strategically comes in… even when parties are not involved.

Voters are allowed to select as many candidates as there are seats on the respective councils, but should they?

Some strategists say no. They recommend “plumping” – voting only for the candidate(s) you really want to see elected. According to “pro-plumping” strategists, by giving a vote to someone you really don’t care about, simply to fill the ballot, weakens the position of those you really do want in.

Others say by not using all your allotted votes, the chances of someone you adamantly oppose getting in, increases.

To plump, or not to plump? That is the question.

By those two arguments, the most logical decision would be to vote for your favourites, as well as anyone other than those you adamantly oppose. You may still end up with fewer than the maximum, but at least you will not be paving the way to a “back door entry” for someone with whose views you completely disagree.

Whichever system you choose on Saturday, we simply urge you to choose.

We encourage everyone to gather as much information as there is available – and there is a plethora of information available – and make an educated choice, whichever way you vote.

Being uneducated, with all the resources available, is not excusable.

Remember, if you choose not to vote, then you have no right to complain about the direction in which your municipality is heading.

– Black Press

Just Posted

Penstocks coming out at old John Hart Generating Station

Work is part of decommissioning of old power station in Campbell River

Campbell River takes steps to plan for long-term sea level rise

Event at Maritim Heritage Centre was second of three public input events

Cougar on Island might have been shot with bow-and-arrow

Conservation officer service looking for animal near Port Alice

Storm could close out semi-finals Wednesday after 3-1 win Monday night

Team would then have to wait for Victoria/Nanaimo series to wrap up on the weekend

VIDEO: Can you believe it? This B.C. hill pulls cars backwards up a slope

Sir Isaac Newton had clearly never been to this Vernon anomaly when he discovered gravity

Canucks hang on for 7-4 win over Senators

Horvat nets 2 for Vancouver

European, Canadian regulators to do own review of Boeing jet

Air Canada plans to remove the Boeing 737 Max from its schedule at least through July 1

Prime minister defends Liberal budget measures as sales effort gets underway

Conservatives under Andrew Scheer say it’s a spree funded by borrowing against the future

Mayor meets with B.C. health minister on homeless taxi transfers

Two homeless people were discharged from Surrey Memorial and sent to a Chilliwack shelter

B.C. lottery winner being sued by co-workers

They claim he owes them $200,000 each, in a lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver

Teacher reprimanded for conduct towards special needs student

Alan Stephen Berry told vice principal he did not have time to use positive strategies

‘Full worm super moon’ to illuminate B.C. skies on first day of spring

Spring has sprung, a moon named in honour of thawing soil marks final super moon until 2020

Having phone within sight while driving does not violate law: B.C. judge

The mere presence of a cell phone within sight of a driver is not enough for a conviction, judge says

Most Read